AAC Cautions About Hiking Apps

Items that do not fit the categories above.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
Hiker Mike
Posts: 142
Joined: 9/23/2004
14ers: 30 
13ers: 4
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: AAC Cautions About Hiking Apps

Post by Hiker Mike »

jrbren_vt wrote: Wed Jul 17, 2024 8:27 am Good point, but I probably like the ego massage when someone says a route that I can do is "hard". On 14ers.com I struggle with the routes that most here call "easy". The YDS class system is confusing to me because the definitions change depending on who you ask or what source you read. For example, it says "hiking on trail" for Class 1 here --> https://www.14ers.com/difficultyratings.php . What's constitutes a trail ? Is hiking limited to walking here ? Why isn't Long's class 1 by this definition ? Isn't there a trail all the way up ? The definitions are different in my hard copy of Freedom of the Hills. That is a whole different thread.
Who was it that said "All 14ers are hard, some are just harder than others."

Longs is basically a Class 1 trail all the the way to the Keyhole. From the Keyhole to the summit, it is Class 3. With the exception of the Narrows.

Mike
"Just because you love the mountains doesn't mean the mountains love you."
-Lou Whittaker
User avatar
colingoodman
Posts: 46
Joined: 10/6/2020
14ers: 41  1 
13ers: 7
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: AAC Cautions About Hiking Apps

Post by colingoodman »

martinleroux wrote: Wed Jul 17, 2024 12:19 pm I think that most people assume quite reasonably that any route that's published on AllTrails is actually a trail, at least for the most part, not an unmarked mountaineering route or a sustained 4th- or 5th-class climb up steep rock. But AllTrails doesn't seem to provide any guidance as to what type of route belongs on their site, or for flagging routes that are technical rock climbs and not hiking trails.
As an extension of the above, here's the "curated" AllTrails page for the Tour de Abyss route on Bierstadt/Bluesky: https://www.alltrails.com/trail/us/colo ... o-sawtooth
The description states "Dogs are welcome, but must be on a leash."

And another "curated" route up Bierstadt listed: https://www.alltrails.com/trail/us/colo ... trail-loop
With seemingly confused reviews like "Out of 100+ hikes in Colorado, this is my least favorite. Felt like most of the time I spent bouldering & rock climbing. Most of the trail is poorly marked." and "USE THE GUANALA PASS DO NOT USE ALLTRAILS DIRECTIONS"
justiner wrote: Wed Jul 17, 2024 3:46 pm The app is made for casual users, and it's these casual users who are getting in trouble.
I agree with Justin here, I don't think AllTrails does a great job communicating to its users. The app is designed to be a means of trail discovery for the casual user and including random and poorly marked class 3 routes seems like it will inevitably confuse people who don't know what they're doing. Potentially annoying at best, potentially dangerous at worst, a failure of the app regardless.
jrbren_vt wrote: Wed Jul 17, 2024 3:54 pm
That would be an enormous leap to assume that means there is a maintained trail. The "trail" is created by the GPX track. I think we need to define what a trail is and isn't. Thanks.
I've always understood "trail" to mean an obvious, marked, and often maintained trail, whereas a "route" is a way to ascend a peak whether there's a trail or not. The latter obviously requires some sense of navigation or a GPX track, the former does not.