Log In 
Report Type 
Mini
Peak(s)  Unnamed 13656  -  13,656 feet
Date Posted  03/20/2025
Date Climbed   05/05/2023
Author  supranihilest
 A Rare Sangre Snow Climb   

There aren't many opportunities for good snow climbs in the Sangre, so I'm always on the lookout for one. I'd already done the thirteeners to the north pre-LiDAR, so when LiDAR demoted previously ranked Point 13,654 and moved the summit south along the ridge I wanted to try something different. Some gullies on the southwest flank of the peak looked promising so I waited until conditions were good in the Sangre, which is typically earlier than other ranges, and went for it.

I'll spare you the details of the South Zapata Creek trail, considering there's already tons of reports for the other peaks in the area that describe it. I hadn't chosen any particular gully before I started so I just scoped them when I neared South Zapata Lake. Some looked better than others. I ended up taking pretty much the farthest and highest viable gully as the rest were already too melted out. It too was getting thin - a few more days and I think parts of it would have been melted out.

22700_20
Nearing South Zapata Lake with Ellingwood Point on left.
22700_21
The gully I climbed up.
22700_22
Partway up and already thin.

The gully twisted and turned occasionally, and had some scrambling on loose rock, but thank god for the snow - this route would probably be horrible dry, if it even worked at all.

22700_24
Loose junk mid-gully.
22700_25
Better snow in the upper half to third.
22700_26
Looking down most of the gully.

All told I got something like 900 vert out of the gully before it dried near the ridge.

22700_27
Ugly but relatively short-lived.

I took off my crampons here and traipsed across the awful, loose talus to a small point where the route became snowy but solid Class 3. I was too far from my crampons now so I just scrambled carefully with no traction.

22700_28
Start of the scramble, which was sustained Class 3 traversing to the summit.
22700_29
Looking back towards the gully (not visible but it's in between the foreground and background slopes; taken on descent.)
22700_30
Another shot towards the summit with my tracks visible in center and below the ridge. (Taken on descent.)
22700_31
Looking back to the start of the scramble, tracks traversing across snow. (Taken on descent.)

The views from this lofty spot were spectacular, as expected.

22700_32
Blanca, Ellingwood, and Little Bear.
22700_33
Lindsey.

My time on the summit was short since it was hotter than hell and I wanted to get down before the snow followed. The scramble back to the gully was slow but once I got my crampons back on I zipped down the gully to the lake, back to the dry trail and down to the trailhead.

All told this route worked better than expected. A week or two earlier would have been even better; keep that in mind if you take this snowy Sangre alternative!


Statistics

Climbers: Ben Feinstein (myself)
Trailhead: Zapata Falls

Total distance: 12.31 miles
Total elevation gain: 4,891feet
Total time: 7:53:59
Peaks: one ranked thirteener

  • Point 13,656

Splits:

Starting Location Ending Location Via Time (h:mm:ss) Cumulative Time (h:mm:ss) Rest Time (m:ss)
Zapata Falls Trailhead Point 13,656 4:30:48 4:30:48 3:38
Point 13,656 Zapata Falls Trailhead 3:19:33 7:53:59 Trip End

My GPS Tracks on Google Maps (made from a .GPX file upload):




Thumbnails for uploaded photos (click to open slideshow):
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13


Comments or Questions
desertdog
User
Snow!
3/22/2025 1:28pm
Thats what I should have done! It was a loose mess when I climbed it.


supranihilest
User
Snow
3/23/2025 9:40pm
Yep, I climbed the others to the north dry and they weren't the best, but you know what is? Snow!


blazintoes
User
SuperNihilest
3/25/2025 2:04pm
Nice route! The ridge direct in winter for all the 13ers sucked. Sucked so bad I bailed into the California basin on the way back. This route bypasses all the suckage.


supranihilest
User
Route
3/25/2025 8:18pm
It might even be a safe route in winter despite the high slope angle due to the aspect. Definitely a good way to avoid doing the ridge twice in proper conditions, anyway.


Jay521
User
Yup. That is the way to do it..
4/19/2025 1:05pm
I did the C2 twice when it was dry. I think that means I am doubly the idiot! LOL! Doing any of those gullies in snow looks like the ONLY way to go.

Nice report!


   Not registered?


Caution: The information contained in this report may not be accurate and should not be the only resource used in preparation for your climb. Failure to have the necessary experience, physical conditioning, supplies or equipment can result in injury or death. 14ers.com and the author(s) of this report provide no warranties, either express or implied, that the information provided is accurate or reliable. By using the information provided, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless 14ers.com and the report author(s) with respect to any claims and demands against them, including any attorney fees and expenses. Please read the 14ers.com Safety and Disclaimer pages for more information.

Please respect private property: 14ers.com supports the rights of private landowners to determine how and by whom their land will be used. In Colorado, it is your responsibility to determine if land is private and to obtain the appropriate permission before entering the property.