On using ropes

Items that do not fit the categories above.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
tdp1
Posts: 23
Joined: 4/25/2011
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by tdp1 »

polar wrote:
tdp1 wrote:I wouldn't go that far, I just wish that people didn't actively discourage mountaineering skills and training. It'd be even better if those skills were encouraged.
I don't think anyone is actively discouraging mountaineering skills and training. At least from my perspective, everyone on the first page was pointing out that climbing equipment does not automatically equals safety, especially with no mention of the skill and knowledge needed to use such equipment.
Nah, I don't see it that way. I see several people stating categorically that you do not need ropes or mountaineering skills to climb any standard route on any 14er in Colorado, what you need are better free scrambling skills. That's how it reads to me.
Let's play a scenario with avalanche safety, how would you reply if someone says something like, "It seems that carrying an avalanche air bag is undervalued in the backcountry skiing/snowboarding community. Many of the avalanches can be made more survivable by using an air bag." Wouldn't you want to point out that even though air bags can save lives, it cannot replace the knowledge and experience in evaluating avalanche risk? People without any avalanche knowledge and training should not go into avalanche terrain, air bag or not.
I'd tell them to carry an airbag, and a beacon, and a probe, and to practice and know how to use them. And then I'd tell them that the conversations I have had after Sheep Creek and a couple other high profile accidents that took away industry luminaries and experts are about how people with training should stay away from avalanche terrain. About how in Colorado you cannot mitigate the risk from deep persistent slabs, how they form every year, and how you are shooting dice with your life every time you do that. I'd tell them about the social factors that lead to bad decision making, about research into group dynamics, about how the soloist may be more safe than the member of a large group of extremely competent professionals. I'd tell them "Never assume that you are the one that can go across that slide path, through that terrain trap, and not get caught."
People with avalanche training can still get caught in a slide, just like rock fall. That's when they may choose to use air bag to stack odds in their favor. Accidents happen to the experienced too, and we all make mistakes, experienced or not. But you don't put the cart before the horse and tell people to get air bag (or climbing gear) first.
The difference between my experiences with experienced backcountry skiers and 14er climbers is this: even before the high profile tragedies, astute athletes in avalanche country would tell you that every single accident was someone's fault, and that none of this could be chalked up to "accidents happen." There was always a failure in the decision chain that led a skier to be in a slide path when it cut loose. Always. Often there was a complex decision chain that got progressively worse until the accident was triggered.

I don't hear that from people who love 14ers, and as much as I love the high country, that hurts me. This isn't about learning mountaineering and rope work to stack the odds in your favor after you're already an expert, it's about whether or not unprotected scrambling can be described as the safest way to approach every part of these routes. Often the safer alternatives are steeper, but they're dismissed out of hand because you aren't supposed to need anything but good scrambling skills to climb all of the Colorado 14ers. As a climber, that's abhorrent - like people are willing to ride unprotected up a steep, chossy, loose garbage gully with rocks raining down at them because it's safer?!? than a 5.2? Or a Class 4 that might take a quick belay off of a terrain feature? Or for that matter, that there aren't places where a quick belay off of a terrain feature might improve the safety of that nasty gully scramble?

So yeah, I'd put the cart before the horse and tell people that they should learn mountaineering skills at the same time that they work their other high altitude skills, on easier 14ers, and then they should apply those skills as they enter more dangerous terrain.
User avatar
justiner
Posts: 4690
Joined: 8/28/2010
14ers: 3  1 
Trip Reports (37)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by justiner »

tdp1 wrote: Often the safer alternatives are steeper, but they're dismissed out of hand because you aren't supposed to need anything but good scrambling skills to climb all of the Colorado 14ers. As a climber, that's abhorrent - like people are willing to ride unprotected up a steep, chossy, loose garbage gully with rocks raining down at them because it's safer?!? than a 5.2? Or a Class 4 that might take a quick belay off of a terrain feature? Or for that matter, that there aren't places where a quick belay off of a terrain feature might improve the safety of that nasty gully scramble?

So yeah, I'd put the cart before the horse and tell people that they should learn mountaineering skills at the same time that they work their other high altitude skills, on easier 14ers, and then they should apply those skills as they enter more dangerous terrain.
I agree very much. Too often the guidebook/website puts a more convenient/"easier" route as the standard, rather than a less convenient/harder route that may have less objective dangers, if only the mountaineer has the correct skills/gear.

Longs Cable Route vs Keyhole is a good example. Meeker Loft vs. Iron Gates. Capitol Ridge (indirect) vs. Direct. Hagerman South Face vs. East Ridge.

Even route descriptions on this site describe a less technical way to do a certain route, rather than a slightly harder, but less chossy variation. These choss feasts need to be labeled as the terrain traps they are.

The relatively well educated, higher class individuals that make up the hiking community of CO will need to take the responsibility for themselves on any route they choose. I get the feeling that some people actually think there are professionals that set up routes like Capitol (indirect) Ridge with perfectly placed cairns every season, rather than just a group of random people. Sadly, this ain't Chamonix.
Long May You Range! Purveyors of fine bespoke adventures
User avatar
AyeYo
Posts: 449
Joined: 9/25/2015
14ers: 13 
13ers: 13 3
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by AyeYo »

tdp1 wrote:Often the safer alternatives are steeper, but they're dismissed out of hand because you aren't supposed to need anything but good scrambling skills to climb all of the Colorado 14ers. As a climber, that's abhorrent - like people are willing to ride unprotected up a steep, chossy, loose garbage gully with rocks raining down at them because it's safer?!? than a 5.2? Or a Class 4 that might take a quick belay off of a terrain feature? Or for that matter, that there aren't places where a quick belay off of a terrain feature might improve the safety of that nasty gully scramble?

So yeah, I'd put the cart before the horse and tell people that they should learn mountaineering skills at the same time that they work their other high altitude skills, on easier 14ers, and then they should apply those skills as they enter more dangerous terrain.

This is spot-on, 100%. Didn't take me long after moving here to realize that the "class 3 because it's easier" approach was flawed.
User avatar
polar
Posts: 1250
Joined: 8/12/2013
14ers: 2 
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by polar »

tdp1 wrote: So yeah, I'd put the cart before the horse and tell people that they should learn mountaineering skills at the same time that they work their other high altitude skills, on easier 14ers, and then they should apply those skills as they enter more dangerous terrain.
That's not putting the cart before the horse. Like I said, putting the cart before the horse is telling people to get climbing equipment, without the mention of proper skill and knowledge of using such equipment.
"Getting to the bottom, OPTIONAL. Getting to the top, MANDATORY!" - The Wisest Trail Sign
User avatar
SoCool
Posts: 662
Joined: 6/18/2014
14ers: 49  1  5 
13ers: 35 3
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by SoCool »

Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
User avatar
Jon Frohlich
Posts: 2650
Joined: 10/14/2005
14ers: 58 
13ers: 168 3
Trip Reports (30)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by Jon Frohlich »

SoCool wrote:Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
Lindsey NW ridge vs gully for one. Or are you asking for one that's totally off a normal route?
User avatar
bergsteigen
Posts: 2361
Joined: 6/14/2008
14ers: 58  52  18 
13ers: 538 100 12
Trip Reports (237)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by bergsteigen »

SoCool wrote:Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
Sneffels SW ridge vs Lavender Col
"Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games." - Ernest Hemingway (or was it Barnaby Conrad?)
Your knees only get so many bumps in life, don't waste them on moguls!
“No athlete is truly tested until they’ve stared an injury in the face and come out on the other side stronger than ever” -anonymous

http://otinasadventures.com @otina
User avatar
LURE
Posts: 1303
Joined: 6/27/2011
14ers: 35 
13ers: 11
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by LURE »

SoCool wrote:Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
I think that's why this is a somewhat flawed debate to begin with. Now we're asking weekend warrior hikers to just be mountaineers, as if it were that simple. I feel like everyone is on kinda on the same page, but how we apply the concepts to Colorado 14ers and the people that hike them is where it gets difficult. If everyone here was a skilled, roped, class 5 climber, there would be little to debate - we're dealing with both ends of the skill spectrum with the people going up the mountains of which all standard routes on average are lopsided on only one end of the difficulty spectrum (arguable, I know).

The focus should be less on ropes and more on general experience, of course ropes play a major roll in mountaineering experience, but we're still talking about routes that do not require ropes.
User avatar
AyeYo
Posts: 449
Joined: 9/25/2015
14ers: 13 
13ers: 13 3
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by AyeYo »

SoCool wrote:Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
Ellingwood as a moderate snow climb in C2 vs a loose talus fest of death in C3.
User avatar
AyeYo
Posts: 449
Joined: 9/25/2015
14ers: 13 
13ers: 13 3
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by AyeYo »

LURE wrote:
SoCool wrote:Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
I think that's why this is a somewhat flawed debate to begin with. Now we're asking weekend warrior hikers to just be mountaineers, as if it were that simple.
That's not what's being asked at all. In fact, the exact opposite was said. It was said that increasing the technicality would likely decrease the number of "weekend warrior" type climbers that have no business being on these mountains in the first place. But when you come up with a walk up (albeit extremely loose and dice-roll risky) route up every 14er, suddenly anyone can do any CO 14er with zero experience or ability - but they're rolling the dice on dying each time.
User avatar
justiner
Posts: 4690
Joined: 8/28/2010
14ers: 3  1 
Trip Reports (37)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by justiner »

SoCool wrote:Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
I gave many. And many are Class 3. And I do feel that weekend warriors should stay off routes that they are not ready for, instead of trying a chossy sneak around. Because people are dying.

I do think putting in the investment of fitness and skills can be worthy in providing safety in the mountains. There's freedom in the hills, but that freedom requires responsibility towards one''s self, actions, and decisions.

Now. I gotta go off and climb Thunder Pyramid. Yay.
Long May You Range! Purveyors of fine bespoke adventures
User avatar
LURE
Posts: 1303
Joined: 6/27/2011
14ers: 35 
13ers: 11
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: On using ropes

Post by LURE »

AyeYo wrote:
LURE wrote:
SoCool wrote:Wait, are we still talking about Colorado 14'ers? Now people are suggesting looking for "steeper but safer" lines off route??? There are VERY few places this would apply. Examples please.
I think that's why this is a somewhat flawed debate to begin with. Now we're asking weekend warrior hikers to just be mountaineers, as if it were that simple.
That's not what's being asked at all. In fact, the exact opposite was said. It was said that increasing the technicality would likely decrease the number of "weekend warrior" type climbers that have no business being on these mountains in the first place. But when you come up with a walk up (albeit extremely loose and dice-roll risky) route up every 14er, suddenly anyone can do any CO 14er with zero experience or ability - but they're rolling the dice on dying each time.
That logic I certainly agree with. It would reduce the number of weekend warriors on mountains they probably aren't ready for yet. But I think we've long passed the point of no return on trying to change that. Increasing experience through education and awareness is all we have at this point. Or bolts and cables put in by the forest service...

I think with peaks where a non roped sneak around exists, it will always be found and dubbed the easiest. Practically feels like a law of physics in regards to human tendencies. I don't know how we deal with that, or if we really can without restricting too many freedoms.

I better rush to finish them so I can say I did all of them before the Zion-like aid routes come in and ruin the purity of the climb :mrgreen: